A Convolutional‑Neural‑Network Surrogate for Steady‑State Radiative Heating in Thermoforming
Abstract - 121
PDF

Keywords

Digital twin
Thermoforming
Radiative heat transfer
Finite‑element simulation
Convolutional neural network

How to Cite

1.
Turan E, Turan B, Sametoğlu A. A Convolutional‑Neural‑Network Surrogate for Steady‑State Radiative Heating in Thermoforming. J. Adv. Therm. Sci. Res. [Internet]. 2025 Dec. 22 [cited 2026 Jan. 18];12:73-84. Available from: https://www.avantipublishers.com/index.php/jatsr/article/view/1717

Abstract

Thermoforming is widely used to produce lightweight packaging and durable components, yet controlling the temperature field during the heating stage remains challenging. Finite‑element models that capture conduction, convection and diffuse‑radiative exchange provide accurate predictions, but their high computational cost precludes real‑time optimization and digital‑twin deployment. In this study a convolutional‑neural‑network (CNN) surrogate is developed to predict steady‑state temperature distributions for a polymer sheet heated by an array of radiative heaters. A parametric study sampled heater temperature distributions, sheet thicknesses and initial temperatures, and a nonlinear finite‑element model was discretized and used to compute steady‑state temperature fields. The resulting dataset of input vectors and temperature maps served to train a fully convolutional neural network, whose weights were optimized with the Adam algorithm by minimizing the mean‑squared error. On a held‑out test set the surrogate achieved a coefficient of determination of 0.96 and a mean relative error less than 3%, while producing predictions in under 1 second—an order‑of‑magnitude speedup relative to the finite‑element solver. Gradient‑based inversion of the trained network successfully recovered heater temperature distributions that reproduced target temperature fields, even under simulated heater failures, demonstrating the feasibility of fault‑tolerant control. These results show that the proposed CNN surrogate bridges high‑fidelity simulation and real‑time control, enabling digital‑twin implementations for thermoforming and providing a foundation for future extensions to transient heating and experimental validation.

https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-5826.2025.12.5
PDF

References

Incropera FP, DeWitt DP, Bergman TL, Lavine AS. Fundamentals of heat and mass transfer. 6th ed. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons; 2007.

Díaz Sierra EF, Cruz De Jesus FM, Jiménez José JJ, Lebrón Santana A, Nuñez Ríos JJ, Traverso Avilés LM. Machine learning surrogate dynamical system model for thermal energy storage. LACCEI Int Multi-Conf Eng Educ Technol. 2024; 1(1): 1795. https://doi.org/10.18687/LACCEI2024.1.1.1795

Johnston G. Digital Twins. The Case for Policy Use. Energy Systems Catapult; 2023.

Throne JL. Radiant heat transfer in thermoforming. SPE ANTEC Tech Papers. 1995; 41: 000.

Nam GJ, Ahn KH, Lee JW. Three-dimensional simulation of thermoforming process and its comparison with experiments. Polym Eng Sci. 2000; 40(10): 2232-40. https://doi.org/10.1002/pen.11355

Ragoubi A, Ducloud G, Agazzi A, Dewailly P, Le Goff R. Modeling the thermoforming process of a complex geometry based on a thermo-visco-hyperelastic model. J Manuf Mater Process. 2024; 8(1): 33. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp8010033

Hosseinionari H, Ramezankhani M, Seethaler R, Milani AS. Development of a computationally efficient model of the heating phase in thermoforming process based on the experimental radiation pattern of heaters. J Manuf Mater Process. 2023; 7(1): 48. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmmp7010048

Schneider T, Beiderwellen Bedrikow A, Dietsch M, Voelkel K, Pflaum H, Stahl K. Machine learning based surrogate models for the thermal behavior of multi-plate clutches. Appl Syst Innov. 2022; 5(5): 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/asi5050097

Laugksch K, Rousseau P, Laubscher R. A PINN surrogate modeling methodology for steady-state integrated thermofluid systems modeling. Math Comput Appl. 2023; 28(2): 52. https://doi.org/10.3390/mca28020052

Tahmasebi Moradi A, Ren V, Le-Creurer B, Mang C, Yagoubi M. Feasibility study of CNNs and MLPs for radiation heat transfer in 2-D furnaces with spectrally participative gases. arXiv preprint arXiv:2506.08033. 2025.

Peng JZ, Liu X, Aubry N, Chen Z, Wu WT. Data-driven modeling of geometry-adaptive steady heat transfer based on convolutional neural networks: heat convection. arXiv preprint arXiv:2101.03692. 2021. https://doi.org/10.3390/fluids6120436

Bokil G, Geyer TF, Wolff S. Towards convolutional neural networks for heat exchangers in electrified aircraft. In: Proceedings of the Deutscher Luft- und Raumfahrtkongress 2023; October 2023; Stuttgart, Germany. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2024-4108

Guo X, Li W, Iorio F. Convolutional neural networks for steady flow approximation. In: Proceedings of the 22nd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD '16). San Francisco, CA, USA; 2016 Aug 13-17. p. 481-90. ACM. https://doi.org/10.1145/2939672.2939738

Sun Y, Elhanashi A, Ma H, Chiarelli MR. Heat conduction plate layout optimization using physics-driven convolutional neural networks. Appl Sci. 2022; 12(21): 10986. https://doi.org/10.3390/app122110986

Stipsitz M, Sanchis-Alepuz H. Approximating the steady-state temperature of 3D electronic systems with convolutional neural networks. Math Comput Appl. 2022; 27(1): 7. https://doi.org/10.3390/mca27010007

Parsons Q, Nowak D, Bortz M, Johnson T, Mark A, Edelvik F. Machine learning surrogates for the optimization of curing ovens. Eng Appl Artif Intell. 2024; 133(Pt C): 108086. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engappai.2024.108086

Sabathiel S, Sanchis-Alepuz H, Wilson AS, Reynvaan J, Stipsitz M. Neural network-based reconstruction of steady-state temperature systems with unknown material composition. Sci Rep. 2024; 14: 22265. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-73380-1

Fiala V, Pechánek R. Surrogate-based heat transfer modeling for important parts in a fully enclosed traction motor. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 2025; 107: 9649–62. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00202-025-02993-0

Turan E, Konuşkan Y, Yıldırım N, Tunçalp D, İnan M, Yasin O, et al. Digital twin modelling for optimizing the material consumption: a case study on sustainability improvement of thermoforming process. Sustain Comput Inform Syst. 2022; 35: 100655. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suscom.2022.100655

Dhondt G. The finite element method for three-dimensional thermomechanical applications. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2004. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470021217

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Erhan Turan, Buryan Turan, Alper Sametoğlu

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.