Educating for Unbuilt Futures: AI as a Co-Speculative Partner in Climate-Resilient Architectural Pedagogy
Abstract - 463
PDF

Keywords

Human–AI co-agency
Cognitive systems in design
Ethics and empathy in design
AI-driven architectural pedagogy
Climate-resilient design education

Categories

How to Cite

1.
Makakli ES. Educating for Unbuilt Futures: AI as a Co-Speculative Partner in Climate-Resilient Architectural Pedagogy . Int. J. Archit. Eng. Technol. [Internet]. 2025 Nov. 10 [cited 2025 Dec. 4];12:145-57. Available from: https://www.avantipublishers.com/index.php/ijaet/article/view/1672

Abstract

Architectural education stands at a critical intersection of accelerating climate crises, technological transformation, and social complexity. At the center of this transition lies Artificial Intelligence (AI)—a defining technology reshaping both design processes and cognitive paradigms. Although AI is becoming increasingly embedded in architectural practice, its pedagogical potential remains predominantly instrumental, often limited to applications in form generation and performance optimization. This study reframes AI as a co-speculative pedagogical partner—a reflective agent capable of nurturing ethical, ecological, and contextually responsive design intelligence. Responding to contemporary challenges such as climate instability, resource scarcity, and spatial inequality, the research aligns with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs 4, 11, and 13). A multi-layered qualitative methodology was adopted to: (i) synthesize theoretical perspectives from speculative design, cognitive science, and environmental philosophy; (ii) examine international frameworks (NAAB, RIBA, UNESCO) to understand how AI’s pedagogical dimension is articulated; and (iii) compare traditional studio pedagogies with emerging AI-augmented workflows. Together, these layers construct a reproducible framework for evaluating AI’s educational integration. The findings identify five interconnected competency domains—technological literacy, strategic design thinking, environmental sensitivity, ethical awareness, and collaborative agency—derived from recent studies and international educational frameworks. While these domains resonate with existing institutional standards, they also reveal the need for new pedagogical models that situate AI within broader ecological and ethical objectives. The study argues that AI can function as a medium for contextual intelligence—bridging computational logic with embodied, climate-responsive creativity. The proposed framework reimagines architectural education as a reflective and adaptive ecosystem where AI enhances, rather than replaces, human judgment. It fosters a synergistic dialogue between data-driven reasoning and embodied design intelligence, preparing future architects to act ethically, creatively, and ecologically within complex design environments.

PDF

References

Leach N. Design in the age of artificial intelligence. Landsc Archit Front. 2018; 6(2): 8-19. https://doi.org/10.15302/J-LAF-20180202

Oxman R. Digital architecture as a challenge for design pedagogy: Theory, knowledge, models and medium. Des Stud. 2008; 29(2): 99-120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.destud.2007.12.003

Schön DA. The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London: Taylor & Francis; 1992.

Vesely D. Architecture in the age of divided representation: The question of creativity in the shadow of production. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2004.

Süyük Makaklı E, Özker S. Basic design in architectural education in Turkey. SHS Web Conf. 2016; 26: 01053. https://doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/20162601053

Crawford K. Atlas of AI: Power, politics, and the planetary costs of artificial intelligence. New Haven (CT): Yale University Press; 2022. https://doi.org/10.12987/9780300252392

Dunne A, Raby F. Speculative everything: Design, fiction and social dreaming. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2013.

Shneiderman B. Human-centered AI. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2022. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192845290.001.0001

Vallor S. Technology and the virtues: A philosophical guide to a future worth wanting. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2016. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190498511.001.0001

Carpo M. Beyond digital: Design and automation at the end of modernity. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press; 2023. https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/13958.001.0001

National Architectural Accrediting Board. 2020 Conditions for Accreditation (Revised May 2025). Washington (DC): NAAB; 2025. Available from: https://www.naab.org/accreditation/accreditation-criteria

Royal Institute of British Architects. RIBA AI Report 2024. London: RIBA; 2024. Available from: https://www.pia.org.za/wp-content/uploads/2024/03/RIBA-Ai_Report-2024.pdf

UNESCO. AI Competency Framework for Students. Paris: UNESCO; 2024. Available from: https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000391105

UNESCO-UIA. UNESCO-UIA Charter for Architectural Education (Revised July 2023). Paris: UNESCO-UIA; 2023. Available from: https://www.uia-architectes.org/en/resource/unesco-uia-charter-for-architectural-education-revised-july-2023

Ingold T. Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. London: Routledge; 2013. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203559055

Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow. New York (NY): Farrar, Straus and Giroux; 2013.

Aaronson S. The problem of human specialness in the age of AI. Shtetl-Optimized Blog. 2025 Sept 13. Available from: https://scottaaronson.blog/?p=7784

Terzidis K. Algorithmic architecture. London: Routledge; 2006. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780080461298

Gero JS, Milovanovic J. Exploring the use of digital tools to support design studio pedagogy through studying collaboration and cognition. In: Gero JS, Eds. Design computing and cognition'20. Cham: Springer; 2022. p. 15-31. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-90625-2_2

Leach N. Architecture in the age of artificial intelligence: An introduction to AI for architects. London: Bloomsbury; 2022. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781350165557

Li C, Zhang T, Du X, Zhang Y, Xie H. Generative AI models for different steps in architectural design: A literature review. Front Archit Res. 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2024.10.001

Rigillo M. Neil Leach. Architecture in the age of artificial intelligence: An introduction to AI for architects. Techne J Technol Archit Environ. 2023; (25): 272-3. https://doi.org/10.36253/techne-14769

Liang CJ, Le TH, Ham Y, Mantha BRK, Cheng MH, Lin JJ, et al. Ethics of artificial intelligence and robotics in the AEC industry. arXiv Prepr. 2023; arXiv:2310.05414.

Buchanan R. Design research and the new learning. Des Issues. 2001;17(4):3-23. https://doi.org/10.1162/07479360152681056

Brown T. Design thinking. Harv Bus Rev. 2008;86(6):84-92.

Wang S, Wang F, Zhu Z, Wang J, Tran T, Du Z. Artificial intelligence in education: A systematic literature review. Expert Syst Appl. 2024; 252: 124167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124167

Biagini G. Towards an AI-literate future: A systematic literature review exploring education, ethics, and applications. Int J Artif Intell Educ. 2025; e-pub ahead. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-025-00466-w

Komatina D, Miletić M, Mosurović Ružičić M. Embracing artificial intelligence (AI) in architectural education: A step towards sustainable practice? Buildings. 2024; 14(8): 2578. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14082578

Jin S, Tu H, Li J, Fang Y, Qu Z, Xu F, et al. Enhancing architectural education through artificial intelligence: A case study of an AI-assisted architectural programming and design course. Buildings. 2024; 14(6): 1613. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings14061613

Elwy I, Hagishima A. The artificial intelligence reformation of sustainable building design approach: A systematic review on building design optimization methods using surrogate models. Energy Build. 2024; 323: 114769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enbuild.2024.114769

European Parliament & Council of the European Union. Regulation (EU) 2024/1689 of the European Parliament and of the Council on artificial intelligence and amending certain Union legislative acts (Artificial Intelligence Act). Off J Eur Union. 2024; L168/1. Available from: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/reg/2024/1689/oj https://doi.org/10.1017/ilm.2024.46

Bernstein P. Machine learning: Architecture in the age of artificial intelligence. London: RIBA Publishing; 2022. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003297192

Horvath AS, Pouliou P. AI for conceptual architecture: Reflections on designing with text-to-text, text-to-image, and image-to-image generators. Front Archit Res. 2024; 13(3): 593-612. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2024.02.006

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2025 Elif Süyük Makakli

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.