Designing an Inclusive City with Chrono-Urbanism Principles
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9821.2023.10.7Keywords:
Inclusivity, Satellite city, Chrono-urbanism, Tallasa District-Makassar CityAbstract
A study was conducted in Tallasa District, the newly developing district in Makassar, Indonesia, to examine all public facilities accessible in the Chrono-Urbanism timeframe and promote social inclusion and equal participation. The study found that while the concept may not be sustainable in the long term, potential development could be achieved through adjustments in spatial planning connections and involving a wide range of age groups in neighborhood designs. The study used the principles of proximity, diversity, density, and digitalization to analyze the concept. The results showed that only the diversity criteria almost met the accessibility and inclusiveness aspects. Applying the Chrono-Urbanism theory may encounter difficulties in regions with large populations and distinctive geographical features such as Indonesia's archipelago. Diverse demographic characteristics, various transportation needs between different areas, and differences in economic and educational strata pose specific challenges. The complexities in managing urban spaces and ensuring proximity and accessibility become more pronounced in densely populated areas and require considerations to accommodate the unique circumstances of each region like Tallasa District in Makassar.
Downloads
References
Marchigiani E, Bonfantini B. Urban transition and the return of neighbourhood planning. Questioning the proximity syndrome and the 15-minute city. Sustainability. 2022; 14(9): 5468. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095468 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14095468
Moreno C. Living in proximity in a living city. Glocalism. 2021; 3: 1-11. https://doi.org/10.12893/gjcpi.2021.3.8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.12893/gjcpi.2021.3.8
Pinto F, Akhavan M. Scenarios for a post-pandemic City: urban planning strategies and challenges of making “Milan 15-minutes city.” Transp Res Procedia. 2022; 60: 370-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.048 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.048
Mariotti I, Di Marino M, Bednář P. The COVID-19 pandemic and the future of working spaces. London: Routledge; 2022. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003181163 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003181163
Caselli B, Carra M, Rossetti S, Zazzi M. Exploring the 15-minute neighbourhoods. An evaluation based on the walkability performance to public facilities. Transp Res Procedia. 2022; 60: 346-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.045 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2021.12.045
Donno MD, Somaschini C, Sciangula IF. The 15 Minutes City: a case study of chrono-urbanism applied to the Lombardy railway stations. (Thesis), Italy: Politecnico di Milano; 2021.
Maftuhin A. Mendefinisikan kota inklusif: asal-usul, teori dan indikator. Tataloka 2017; 19(2): 93-103. https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.19.2.93-103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.14710/tataloka.19.2.93-103
Haque I, Mehta S, Kumar A. Towards sustainable and inclusive Cities: The case of Kolkata. ORF Special Report No. 83, March 2019, Observer Research Foundation; 2019.
Ferrer-Ortiz C, Marquet O, Mojica L, Vich G. Barcelona under the 15-Minute City Lens: Mapping the accessibility and proximity potential based on pedestrian travel times. Smart Cities. 2022; 5: 146-61. https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5010010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/smartcities5010010
Sezer E. 15 minute city concept. A glance at the palermo case study. IN FOLIO. 2022; (39): 20-9.
Noworól A, Kopyciński P, Hałat P, Salamon J, Hołuj A. The 15-minute city—the geographical proximity of services in krakow. Sustainability. 2022; 14(12): 7103. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14127103
Jaiswal AP, Hatkar ES. Inclusive planning: smart solution for city design. Int J Emerg Technol. 2017; 8(1): 521-3.
Alessandria F. Inclusive city, strategies, experiences and guidelines. Procedia Soc Behav Sci. 2016; 223: 6-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.274 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.274
De Paris SR, Lopes CNL. Housing flexibility problem: Review of recent limitations and solutions. Front Archit Res. 2018; 7: 80-91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2017.11.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2017.11.004
Siltanen J, Klodawsky F, Andrew C. “This is how I want to live my life”: An experiment in prefigurative feminist organizing for a more equitable and inclusive city. Antipode. 2015; 47: 260-79. https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12092 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/anti.12092
Francis M. A case study method For landscape architecture. Washington DC: Landscape Architecture Foundation; 1999.
Zainal Z. Case study as a research method. J Kemanusiaan. 2007; 5(1): 1-6.
Khavarian-Garmsir AR, Sharifi A, Hajian Hossein Abadi M, Moradi Z. From garden city to 15-Minute city: A historical perspective and critical assessment. Land (Basel) 2023; 12: 512. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020512 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020512
Allam Z, Bibri SE, Jones DS, Chabaud D, Moreno C. Unpacking the ‘15-Minute City’ via 6G, IoT, and digital twins: towards a new narrative for increasing urban efficiency, resilience, and sustainability. Sensors. 2022; 22(4): 1369. https://doi.org/10.3390/s22041369 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s22041369
Murgante B, Valluzzi R, Annunziata A. Developing a 15-minute city: Evaluating urban quality using configurational analysis. The case study of Terni and Matera, Italy. Appl Geogr. 2024; 162: 103171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.103171 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2023.103171
Aidina AI, Malihu L. Lapangan karebosi kota makassar (1990-2017). Universitas Negeri Makassar; 2020.
Sutherland H. Whose makassar? claiming space in a segmented city. Comp Stud Soc Hist. 2011; 53: 791-826. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417511000417 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0010417511000417
Surya B, Salim A, Hernita H, Suriani S, Menne F, Rasyidi ES. Land use change, urban agglomeration, and urban sprawl: A sustainable development perspective of makassar city, Indonesia. Land. 2021; 10(6): 556. https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060556 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060556
Arake A, Winarti Y. Literature Review : Hubungan antara kecanduan smartphone dengan prestasi belajar pada remaja di indonesia. J Islamic Contemp Psychol (JICOP). 2022; 3: 49-57. https://doi.org/10.25299/jicop.v2i1.10263 DOI: https://doi.org/10.25299/jicop.v2i1.10263
Machmud K. The smartphone use in indonesian schools: The high school students’ perspectives. Journal of Arts and Humanities 2018; 7(3): 33-40. https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v7i3.1354 DOI: https://doi.org/10.18533/journal.v7i3.1354
Becker SE, Dickinson JI, Sullivan K, Cline H. Baby boomer knowledge and stigma toward aging in place and residential assistive devices. J Inter Des. 2020; 45: 43-61. https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12176 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/joid.12176
Nalaskowska S. How to bring the city closer to people? Using spatial network analysis to create a 15-minute city. In: European transport conference 201, September 7-15, 2021. p.1-16.
Cochrane L, Al-Hababi R. Sustainable qatar. In: Rahman MM, Ed., Gulf Studies, vol. 9, Singapore: Springer; 2023, pp. 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7398-7_1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-19-7398-7_1
Choi JY, Choi SB, Lee JH, Kim TH, Im WS. Designing a foss4g-based walkable living area planning support module to assists the korean 15-minute city. Int Arch Photogramm Remote Sens Spatial Inf Sci. XLVIII-4/W7-2023, 19-24. https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W7-2023-19-2023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/isprs-archives-XLVIII-4-W7-2023-19-2023
Hunter RF, Cleland C, Cleary A, Droomers M, Wheeler BW, Sinnett D, et al. Environmental, health, wellbeing, social and equity effects of urban green space interventions: A meta-narrative evidence synthesis. Environ Int. 2019; 130: 104923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.104923 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2019.104923
Africa J, Heerwagen J, Loftness V, Ryan Balagtas C. Biophilic design and climate change: performance parameters for health. Front Built Environ. 2019; 5: Article 28. https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00028 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fbuil.2019.00028
Richardson M, Butler CW. Nature connectedness and biophilic design. Build Res Inform. 2022; 50: 36-42. https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2021.2006594 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09613218.2021.2006594
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Khilda W. Nur, Andi A. Amalia, Fitrawan Umar, Lutfiah Hafifah, Aisyah A.A. Alkatiri, Khaerul Mubarak, Muhammad A. Syamsuddin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All the published articles are licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC 4.0) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
