Morphology of the Urban Phenomenon and Its Relation with Urban Livability
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9821.2023.10.8Keywords:
Land use, Mixed-use, Urban blocks, Urban livability, Urban morphologyAbstract
The livability of a city is a crucial aspect that greatly influences the well-being of its residents, and its relationship with the city's morphology is significant. This study aims to examine the correlation between block livability and block form. In the first step, the goal is to propose a quantitative model, the "Livable Block Index (LBI)," to measure the level of livability. The LBI considers the multi-functionality of urban zones as a key factor in measuring block livability, analyzing both the variety of uses within each lot and the distribution of uses across the block. Additionally, the study investigates the form of urban blocks, considering their area, shape, and proportions. The proposed model is applied to specific districts in Tehran, using Grasshopper for data modeling, visualization, and analysis. Initial findings reveal a meaningful relationship between block form and livability levels; however, it is apparent that a comprehensive understanding requires the consideration of additional parameters. Further research is necessary to develop a more comprehensive view of the correlations between urban block form and livability.
Downloads
References
Sofeska E. Understanding the livability in a city through smart solutions and urban planning toward developing sustainable livable future of the city of Skopje. Procedia Environ Sci. 2017; 37: 442-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2017.03.014
Gehl J. How to study public life. Washington, DC: Island Press/Center for Resource Economics; 2013. https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-525-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5822/978-1-61091-525-0
Huang J, Chang H, Obracht-Prondzyńska H, Kamrowska-Zaluska D. A city is not a tree: a multi-city study on street network and urban life. Landsc Urban Plan. 2022; 226: 104469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104469 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104469
Frost AR. Quantifying the sustainability, livability, and equity performance of urban and suburban places in California. Transp Res Rec. 2018; 2672: 130-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118791382
Jacobs J. The death and life of great American cities. Vintage, Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2016, p. 94-109. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119084679.ch4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119084679.ch4
Galle P. Christopher alexander’s battle for beauty in a world turning ugly: The inception of a science of architecture? She Ji. J Des Econ Innov. 2020; 6: 345-75. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sheji.2020.03.002
Frost AR. Quantifying the sustainability, livability, and equity performance of urban and suburban places in California. Transp Res Rec. 2018; 2672: 130-44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118791382 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118791382
Brielmann AA. What happens in your brain when you walk down the street? implications of architectural proportions, biophilia, and fractal geometry for urban science. Urban Sci. 2022; 6: 3. https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci6010003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/urbansci6010003
Guan C. Designing walkable cities and neighborhoods in the era of urban big data. Urban Plan Int. 2019; 34: 9-15. https://doi.org/10.22217/upi.2019.389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22217/upi.2019.389
Cheng S. Measuring urban mixed-use conditions and their impact on street vitality: a mixed-method approach tested in the context of Hong Kong’s new towns. J Urban. 2023: 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2023.2173273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17549175.2023.2173273
Dovey K. What is functional mix? An assemblage approach. Plan Theory Pract. 2017; 18: 249-67. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2017.1281996 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2017.1281996
Ye Y. Quantitative tools in urban morphology: combining space syntax, spacematrix and mixed-use index in a GIS framework. Urban Morphol. 2014; 18: 97-118. https://doi.org/10.51347/jum.v18i2.3997 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51347/jum.v18i2.3997
Van Nes AB. Combination of Space syntax with spacematrix and the mixed use index: The Rotterdam South test case. In 8th International Space Syntax Symposium, Santiago de Chile, Santiago: 2012.
Allam Z. The theoretical, practical, and technological foundations of the 15-minute city model: proximity and its environmental, social and economic benefits for sustainability. Energies (Basel). 2022; 15(16): 6042. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15166042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/en15166042
Martino N. Urban form and livability: socioeconomic and built environment indicators. Buildings and Cities 2021; 2: 220-43. https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.82 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/bc.82
Mirzahossein H. Increasing citizen’s livability in the future city: Responsive city, a remarkable solution. Theor Empir Res Urban Manag. 2021; 16: 23-41.
Zenouzi AS. Analysis of changes in vegetation index during the rapid urban spatial development period (1990–2020) in tehran metropolis, Iran. Atmosphere (Basel). 2022; 13(12): 2010. https://doi.org/10.3390/atmos13122010
Ziafati Bafarasat A. Strategic urban design for sustainable development: A framework for studio and practice. Sustain Dev. 2023; 31: 1861-72. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2489 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2489
Almasi SA. Exposure based geographic analysis mode for estimating the expected pedestrian crash frequency in urban traffic zones; case study of Tehran. Accid Anal Prev. 2022; 168: 106576. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106576 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106576
Xia C. Analyzing spatial relationships between urban land use intensity and urban vitality at street block level: A case study of five Chinese megacities. Landsc Urban Plan. 2020; 193: 103669. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103669 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2019.103669
Raman R. Taxonomy of urban mixed land use planning. Land Use Policy. 2019; 88: 104102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104102
Yue Y. Measurements of POI-based mixed use and their relationships with neighbourhood vibrancy. Int J Geograph Inform Sci. 2017; 31: 658-75. https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2016.1220561 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13658816.2016.1220561
Yu H. Morphological and functional polycentric structure assessment of megacity: An integrated approach with spatial distribution and interaction. Sustain Cities Soc. 2022; 80: 103800. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103800 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103800
Ghannadpour SF. Optimizing triple bottom-line objectives for sustainable health-care waste collection and routing by a self-adaptive evolutionary algorithm: A case study from Tehran province in Iran. J Clean Prod. 2021; 287: 125010. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125010
Madanipour A. Rethinking public space: between rhetoric and reality. Urban Des Int. 2019; 24: 38-46. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-019-00087-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/s41289-019-00087-5
Ghanbari R. Land surface temperature analysis in densely populated zones from the perspective of spectral indices and urban morphology. Int J Environ Sci Technol. 2023; 20: 1-20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04725-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-022-04725-4
Neysani NR. The role of morphological spatial indices in the suitability of urban earthquake management. Earth Observ Geomat Eng. 2022; 6: 151-9.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Samaneh Shahbazi, Mohamadali Nematollahi , Nashid Nabian
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All the published articles are licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC 4.0) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
