The World's Largest Anomalies of Electrical Conductivity and their Nature - A Review


Electrical conductivity
crustal anomalies
magnetotelluric soundings.

How to Cite

A.A. Zhamaletdinov. The World’s Largest Anomalies of Electrical Conductivity and their Nature - A Review. Glob. J. Earth Sci. Eng. [Internet]. 2015 Jan. 15 [cited 2022 Aug. 19];1(2):84-96. Available from:


Geoelectrical parameters, structure and geologic-tectonic position of a number of largest anomalies of electrical conductivity on different continents of the planet Earth are analyzed against the background of published and some new experimental data. Criteria of dividing nomalies into fluid and electronically conducting varieties, and their relation with mineral deposits are considered. In Memory of Sergey Kulik


Keller GV, Anderson LG, Pritchard YI. Geological Survey Investigations of the Crust and Upper Mantle. Geophysics 1966; 6: 1078-1087.

Lyubimova EA. Fel’dman IS. Heat Flow Temperature and Electrical Conductivity of the Crust and Upper Mantle. In Earth’s Crust and Upper Mantle. Moscow: Moscow Univ 1975; 2: 144-190.

Hyndman RD, Shearer PM. Water in the Lower Continental Crust: Modeling Magnetotelluric and Seismic Reflection Results. Geophys J Int 1989; 98: 343-365.

Van’yan LL. Electrical Conductivity of the Earth’s Crust in Connection with Its Fluid Regime. In Crustal Conductivity Anomalies. SPb. Science 1984; pp. 27-35.

Shankland TJ, Ander ME. Electrical Conductivity, Temperatures and Fluids in the Lower Crust. J Geophys Res B 1983; 9475-9484.

Yardley BWD, Valley JW. The petrologic case for a dry lower crust. Journal of Geophysical Research. VN B6. 1997; 12: 173-185.

Rodkin MF. The role of deep fluid regime in geodynamics and seismotectonics. M., 1993; p. 193.

Jones AG. MT and Reflection: an Essential Combination. Geophys J R Astron Soc 1987; 89: 7-18.

Archie GE. The electrical reistivity as an aid, determining some reservoir characteristcs. Transactions of the American Institute of Mining 1942; 146: 54.

Van’yan LL. Electromagnetic soundings. Moscow. Nauchny Mir 1997; p. 218.

Kola Super Deep Well. Editor-in-chief Ye. Kozlovsky. Moscow. Nedra 1984; p. 490.

Van’yan LL, Shilovsky PP. Deep Electrical Conductivity of Oceans and Continents. Moscow Science 1983.

Fel'dman IS, Zhamaletdinov АА. Fluid and thermal conductivity model of the lithosphere by the laboratory data. In: proceedings of International conference Integrated geological and geophysical models of ancient shields. - Apatity. Geological Institute of the KSC RAS 2009; 100-107.

Cermak V, Lastovickova M. Temperature Profiles in the Earth of Importance to Deep Electrical Conductivity Models. Pageoph 1987; 125: 255-284.

Semenov AS. The Nature of Electrical Conductivity in the Ancient Basement. Vestnik SPb Univ 1970; 12: 19-26.

Semenov AS. The Structure and Nature of Electrical Conductivity in the Ancient Basement. Sci Rep of SPb Univ. Problems of Geophysics 1971; 21: 2-26.

Fainberg FS, Semenov AS. Variation in Mineral Composition and Magnetic Susceptibility for Iron-Bearing Rocks and Ores Depending on Temperature. Sci Rep of SPb Univ. Problems of Geophysics 1962; 12: 286: 42-49.

Vagshal DS. On Electrical Conductivity of Serpentine rocks. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 1970; 190(3): 651-654.

Kraev AP, Semenov AS, Tarkhov AG. Ultra-deep Electrical Sounding. Razvedka Nedr 1947; 3: 40-41.

Semenov AS, Zhamaletdinov AA. Deep Electrical Soundings, Vestn Leningr Univ. Ser 7: Geol Geogr 1981; 3(18): 5-11.

Zhamaletdinov AA. Electron-conducting structures of the North-West of the Kola peninsula and their influence on results of the deep soundings of the Earth Crust. Geod. geophys Veroff R 111, H 47, Berlin D 1980; 207-223.

Zhamaletdinov AA. Graphite in the Earth’s Crust and Electrical Conductivity Anomalies. Izvestiya. Physics of the Solid Earth 1996; 32(4): 272-288.

Zhamaletdinov AA. Electron-conducting structures of the continental lithosphere. In: Proceedings of International conference Integrated geological and geophysical models of ancient shields. Apatity Geological Institute KSC RAS 2009; 70-76

Babadzhanov TP, Basov MD, Gatina RM, et al. The Ural- Tien Shan Anomaly of Electrical Conductivity. Izv Akad Nauk SSSR. Fiz Zemli 1986; 6: 79-90.

Berdichevskii MN, Borisova VN, Bubnov GN. Electrical Conductivity Anomaly in the Yakutia Crust. Izv Akad Nauk SSSR Fiz Zemli 1969; 10: 22-41.

Moroz YuF. Electrical Conductivity of the Earth’s Crust and Upper Mantle of the Kamchatka Peninsula. Moscow: Nauka 1991; 180.

Shapiro VA. The Ural-Tien Shan Anomaly of Electrical Conductivity. Dokl Akad Nauk SSSR 1988; 299(3): 598-602.

Bakirov AB. Endogenic Geological Formations of the Tien- Shan. Part II. In: Metamorphic Formations Frunze Ilim 1984; 215.

Poltoratskaya OL, Panarin VP, Popov GI. The West-Yakutian Anomaly of Electrical Conductivity. In Crustal Anomalies of Electrical Conductivity. SPb Science 1984: 116-122.

Fel’dman IS, Bastrakova, NP, Lifshits VN, et al. Deep Electrical Conductivity of the Western Siberian Platform and Adjacent Areas. In: Electromagnetic Studies. Zvenigorod: Nauka 1984; 89.

Rusanova OD. To the Problem on the Carbon Source of Natural Diamonds. In: The Ancient Ultrabasic Crust of Weathering in the North Urals. Proceedings of Sverlovsky Mining Inst 1975; 118: 105-118.

Podlovilin ES, Gablin NS. Geological Structure of the Timano-Pecherskii Basement from Magnetotelluric Investigations. In Crustal Anomalies of Electrical Conductivity. Leningrad Science 1984; 101-107.

Al’perovich IM, Nikiforov VM. The Electrical Conductivity Anomalies in the Sakhalin Crust. Doklady Earth Sciences. USSR 1979; 244(5): 1194-1196.

Rokitjansky II. Inductive soundings of the Earth Kiev. Naukova Dumka 1981; 296.

Rokityansky II, Shuman VN, Logvinov IM, Lysenko ES, Pavlovsky VI, Zhamaletdinov AA, Tokarev AD, Zakharova VI. Frequency Soundings over the Kirovograd Electrical Conductivity Anomaly. Geophysical Journal. Kiyev Naukova Dumka 1983; 5(2): 88-90.

Enenshtein BS. The Anomalous Zones of High Electrical Conductivity within the Basement. In; Geophizichesky sbornick Kiyev. Naukova Dumka 1978; 84: 43-48.

Zhamaletdinov AA, Kovalevsky VYa, Pavlovsky VI, Tanachev GS, Tokarev AD. Deep electrical sounding with DC power line of 800 kV Volgograd - Donbass. Doklady Earth Sciences. USSR 1982; 265(5): 1101-1105.

Sidorenko SvA, Sidorenko AV. Organic Matter in Precambrian Sedimentary-Metamorphic Rocks). Moscow. Nauka 1975.

Karagodin IN. The Source of Hydrocarbons in the Gigantic Oil Accumulations of Neocomian Deposits in West Siberia. Doklady Earth Sciences. USSR 1994; 334(4): 484-488.

Kovtun AA. The use of the natural electromagnetic field in the study of the electrical conductivity of the Earth. SPb University 1980; p.195.

Korja T. Electrical conductivity distribution of the lithosphere in the central Fennoscandian Shield. Precambrian Research 64: 85-108.

Kulik SN. High conductivity anomalies in the Continental Earth Crust Proceedings of the institute of fundamental studies. Kiev Logos 2004; 14-21.

Zhamaletdinov AA, Kulik SN. The largest conductivity anomalies in the world. Kiev Naukova Dumka. Geophysical Journal 2012; 34(4): 22-39.

Boerner DE, Kurtz RD, Graven JA. Electrical conductivity and Paleo-Proterozoic foredeeps. Journal of Geophysical Research 1996; 101(B6): 13775-13791.

Jones AG, Craven JA. The North American central plains anomaly and its correlation with gravity, magnetic, seismic, and heat flow data in Saskatchewan, Canada. Phys Earth Planet Inter 1990; 60: 169-194.

Schmucker U. Anomalies of geomagnetic vfriations in the southwestern United States. Bull. Scripps Institute Oceanography 1970;13: p.165.

Camfield PA, Gough DI. A possible Proterozoic plate boundary in North America Can. J Earth Sci 1977; 14: 1229-1238.

Handa S, Camfield PA. Crustal electrical conductivuty in north-central Saskatchewan: The North American Central Plains anomaly and its relation to a Proterosoic plate margin Canadian. J Earth Sci 1984; 21: 533-543.

Porath H, Oldenburg DW, Gough DI. Separation of magnetic variation fields and conductive structures in the western United States. Geophys J R astr Soc 1970; 19(3): 237-260.

Porath H. Magnetic variation anomalies and seismic lowvelocity zone in the western United States. JGR 1971; 76(11): 2643-2648.

Gilluly D. Tectonic movements associated with the evolution of mountain ridges. In: Nature of the solid Earth. (eds Yu Robertson) Moscow. Mir 1975; 225-251.

Brasse H, Lezaeta P, Rath V. The Bolivian Altiplano conductivity anomaly. // Journal of Geophysical Research 2001; 10.1029/2001 JB 000391.

Soyer W, Brasse H. A magneto-variation array study in Central Andes of N. Chile and SW Bolovia. Geophysical Research Letters, 28, 3023-3026, 2001.

Sakkas V, Meju MA, Khan MA, Haak V, Simson F. Magnetotelluric images of the crustal structure of Chyulu Hills vulkanic field, Kenya. Tectonophysics 2002; 346: 169-185.

Blohm EK, Worzyk P, Scriba H. Geoelectrical deep soundings in Southern Africa using the Cabora Bassa power line. Journal of Geophysics 1977; 43: 665-679.

Lilley FEM, Wang LJ, Chamalaun FH, Ferguson IJ. The Carpentaria electrical conductivity anomaly. Queensland as a major structure in the Australian Plate. GSAA Monograph 2001; 1-16.

Kennett BLN. Seismic structure in the mantle beneath Australia. // Australian Journal Earth Sciences 2002; 999: 888-999.

Arora BR. Magnetometer array studies in India: present status, data interpretation and assessment of numerical modelling results. Proceedings of the Indian Academy of Sciences. Earth and Planetary Sciences1990; 99(4): 693- 716.

Chen L, Booker JR, Jones AG, et al. Electrically conductive crust in southern Tibet from INDEPTH magnetotelluric surveying. Science 1996; 274: 1694-1695.

Chien-Chih Chen1 and Chow-son Chen. Preliminary report on the Sanyi-Puli seismic zone conductivity anomaly and its correlation with velocity structure and seismicity in the Northwestern Taiwan LETTER Earth Planets Space 2000; 52: 377-381.

Rokityansky II. Investigation of electrical conductivity anomalies by magnetovariational profiling. Kiev Naukova Dumka 1975; p. 279.

Semenov VYu, Jozwiak W, Pek J. Deep Electromagnetic Soundings Conducted in Trans-European Suture Zone. Eos, Transactions, American Geophysical Union 2003; 84(52): 581-584.

Adam A. Graphite/graphitic rocks as cause of the electric conductivity anomaly and their relationship to the tectonics - a review. Acta Geol Hung 2005; 40(3-4): 391-411.

Feldman IS, et al. Magnetotelluric and seismic study of the Earth crust and upper Mantle in the Caucasus region. Induction Electromagnetique Dans la Terre. Brest Univ de Bretagne 1994; 65.

Wiese H. Geomagnetische Tiefentellurik. Teil III: Die geomagnetischen Variationen in Mittel- und Sudost-Eoropa als Indikator der Streichrichtund grossraumiger elektrischer Untergrundstrukturen. Geofisica pura et applicata 1963; 56: 101-114.

Adam A. Electric crustal anomalies in the Carpathian Basin and their origin in the rock composition. Acta Geol. Hung 1974; 18: 13-22.

Cermak V, Hurtig E. Preliminary heat flow map of Europe. Czechoslovakia. Praha 1977.

Stanley WD. Comparison of geoelectrical/tectonic models for suture zones in the western U. S. A. and eastern Europe: are black shales a possible source of high conductivities?. Phys. Earth Planet Inter 1989; 53: 228-238.

Zhamaletdinov AA. On Electronocally Conductive Nature of the Carpathians anomaly (Geoelectric, Geothermal and Geodynamic aspects). Publs Ins. Geophys Pol Acad Sc 2005; C-95 (386): 43-58.

Matkovskiy OE, Kulchetskaya AA. Graphite. In: Minerals of the Ukrainian Carpathians. Kiev. Naukova Dumka 1990; 45-51.

Paterson D. Methane from the Bowels of the Earth. New Sci 1978; 78(1109): 896-898.

Vinogradov AP. Oxygen Isotopes and Photosynthesis Moscow. Akad Nauk USSR 1962; p. 32.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2015 Global Journal of Earth Science and Engineering