Innovative Methodological Instrument for Quantification of Professional Risk Specific to Complex Systems of Work

Authors

  • Gabriel Vasilescu National Institute for Research and Development in Mine Safety and Protection to Explosion–Insemex Petroşani, 32-34 G-ral Vasile Milea STR, 332047 Petroşani, Hunedoara, Romania
  • Mihail Vătăsescu Polytechnic University of Timisoara, Revolutiei Street no.5, 331128, Hunedoara County, Romania
  • Passca Mihaela Polytechnic University of Timisoara, Revolutiei Street no.5, 331128, Hunedoara County, Romania
  • Ciprian Jitea National Institute for Research and Development in Mine Safety and Protection to Explosion–Insemex Petroşani, 32-34 G-ral Vasile Milea STR, 332047 Petroşani, Hunedoara, Romania

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15377/2410-3624.2014.01.01.2

Keywords:

Methodology, workplace, risk factor, assessment.

Abstract

This paper presents research on estimating and assessing occupational risks to secure specific activities in the presence of hazards of industrial work systems, and is based on a thorough knowledge of interdisciplinary concepts from various fields related to systems security engineering.

Author Biographies

Mihail Vătăsescu, Polytechnic University of Timisoara, Revolutiei Street no.5, 331128, Hunedoara County, Romania

Faculty of Engineering

Passca Mihaela, Polytechnic University of Timisoara, Revolutiei Street no.5, 331128, Hunedoara County, Romania

Faculty of Engineering

References

Dragos Vasilescu Non-conventional methods for analysis and evaluation of occupational risks, INSEMEX Publishing House. Petroşani ISBN 978-973-88590-0-5, 2008.

Dragos Vasilescu Probabilistic calculation methods used to diagnose and prognose industrial risk, INSEMEX Publishing House 2008. Petroşani ISBN 978-973-88753-2-6, 2008.

Desroches A. Concepts et methodes probabilistes de base de la securite. Lavoisier-TEC&DOC 1995 Paris.

Murè, Demichela, Piccinini. Assessment of the risk of occupational accidents using a "fuzzy" approach, Cognition, Technology and Work 2006; 8: 103-112. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10111-005-0025-5

Marhavilas, Koulouriotis. A risk-estimation methodological framework using quantitative assessment techniques and real accidents' data: Application in an aluminum extrusion industry, Journal of loss prevention in the process industries 2008; 21: 596-603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2008.04.009

Papadopoulos, Georgiadou, Papazoglou. Occupational and public health and safety in a changing work environment. An integrated approach for risk assessment and prevention Safety science 2010, 48, 943-949. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2009.11.002

Conte, Rubio, Garcia. Occupational accidents model based on risk-injury affinity groups. Safety science 2011; 49: 306- 314. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2010.09.005

Martini, Fantini, D'ovidio. Risk assessment of aggression toward emergency health care workers. Occupational medicine (Oxford) 2012; 62: 223-225.

Lee, Kim, Park. Construction Risk Assessment Using Site Influence Factors. Journal of computing in civil engineering 2012; 26: 319-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CP.1943-5487.0000146

Von Misses R. The Mathematical Theory of Prob and Statistics. Academic Press New York 1964.

Reichenbach H. Wahrscheinlickheitslehre. Leiden 1935.

Kolmogorov A. The Foundations of the Calculus of Probability. New York 1950.

Downloads

Published

2014-11-27

How to Cite

1.
Gabriel Vasilescu, Mihail Vătăsescu, Passca Mihaela, Ciprian Jitea. Innovative Methodological Instrument for Quantification of Professional Risk Specific to Complex Systems of Work. Glob. Environ. Eng. [Internet]. 2014Nov.27 [cited 2021Sep.16];1(1):11-23. Available from: https://www.avantipublishers.com/jms/index.php/tgevnie/article/view/130

Issue

Section

Articles