Optimization of Hydrocarbon Production from Unconventional Shale Reservoirs using Numerical Modelling

Authors

  • J. Will DYNARDO GmbH, Steubenstraße 25, D-99423 Weimar, Germany
  • S. Eckardt DYNARDO GmbH, Steubenstraße 25, D-99423 Weimar, Germany

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-787X.2017.04.01.3

Keywords:

Hydraulic fracturing simulation, model calibration, hydrocarbon production optimization.

Abstract

 The success of unconventional hydrocarbon extraction depends on the effective stimulation of reservoir rocks. Industry practice is to conduct a large number of field trials requiring high capital investment and long cycle-time. The workflow outlined in this paper, using best available reservoir data in combination with best available simulation models offer a cheaper and faster alternative approach for optimization of the complete design and for the improvement of production. Integrating subsurface characteristics, well completion, well operation, diagnostic and well performance analysis by using asset specific data, the development of an optimal completion design is possible. This results in the reduction of field trials, which is primarily necessary for achieving the optimal completion design. In addition, it provides valuable insights for further data acquisition to evaluate and forecast performance of the well. This paper introduces the workflow to model, calibrate and optimize the landing and orientation of the well including hydraulic fracturing stimulation design for naturally fractured unconventional shale reservoirs. For fracture simulation, the paper introduces an approach for parametric coupled hydro-mechanical 3D Finite Element (FEM) modeling, including non-linear material modeling of fracture propagation in sedimentary rocks. In order to calculate production out of the created fracture network, estimation of accessible connected hydrocarbons is calculated. For calibration and optimization purposes, automated sensitivity studies for uncertainty variations of the reservoir parameters as well as engineering and operational parameters are performed and are evaluated relative to the resulting Stimulated Reservoir Volume (SRV), Accessible Hydrocarbon initially in Place (AHCIIP) and Estimated Ultimate Recovery (EUR). The current version of this technology does not handle proppant transport and placement. Instead, assumptions are made for proppant acceptance in the fracture network and used in estimating the proppant accepting simulated rock volume, connected hydrocarbons, and hydrocarbon production. Further enhancement of the FEM workflow to capture 3D proppant transport and placement is under development and will be a major update in the upcoming hydraulic fracture simulator version.

References

ANSYS, Inc., ANSYS®, Release 17, Canonsburg, PA, 2016.

Dynardo GmbH, 3D Hydraulic fracturing simulator, version 3.7.4, documentation.ppt, Weimar, 2016.

Dynardo GmbH, optiSLang® - The optimizing structural language, Version 5.1, Weimar, 2016.

L. Weijers. Evaluation of oil industry stimulation practices for Engineered Geothermal Systems, Pinnacle Report DOEPS36- 04GO94001,“ October 2007.

M. G. Zielonka, K. H. Searles, J. Ning and S. R. Buechler, Development and validation of fully-coupled hydraulic fracturing simulation capabilities, in 2014 Simulia Community Conference, 2014.

W. Wittke, Felsmechanik: Grundlagen für wirtschaftliches Bauen im Fels, Springer-Verlag, 1984. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-52235-2

T. Bai, J. Will, et al. Hydraulic modeling workflow and toolkits for well completion optimization in Unconventionals. SPE 179137 Hydraulic Fracturing Conference in Woodlands in USA 2016.

J. Will, Beitrag zur Standsicherheitsberechnung im geklüfteten Fels in der Kontinuums- und Diskontinuumsmechanik unter Verwendung impliziter und expliziter Berechnungsstrategien, in Berichte des Institutes für Strukturmechanik 2/99, Dissertation, Bauhaus Universität Weimar, 1999.

R. Schlegel, J. Will and M. Jobmann, Using statistical methods for rock parameter identification to analyse the THM behaviour of Callovo-Oxfordian claystone, in Second EAGE Workshop on Geomechanics and Energy, Celle, 13-15 October 2015. https://doi.org/10.3997/2214-4609.201414298

T. Most and J. Will. Efficient sensitvity analysis for virtual prototyping, in Proceedings of the 6th European Congress of Computational Methods in Applied Sciences and Engineering, Vienna, 2012.

Y. Gao, R. Yuan, J. Will, T. Bai, et al. An integrated Geomechanics-Reservoir modeling workflow for Hydraulic Fracturing optimisation and EUR prediction for a shale gas play in Sichuan Basin; SPE 181801, Asia Pacific Hydraulic Fracturing Conference 2016. https://doi.org/10.2118/181801-MS

Venkat S, Eckardt S, Will J. Simulation of penny shaped fracture using homogenized continuum approach; Proceedings Weimarer Optimierung- und Stochastiktage 2015, Weimar, Germany (www.dynardo.de).

Ranjan A, Eckardt S, Will J. Simulation of fracture design generation, production characteristics and temperature development of a Hot Dry Rock Geothermal Reservoir; Proceedings Weimarer Optimierung- und Stochastiktage 2015, Weimar, Germany.

Downloads

Published

2017-07-25

How to Cite

1.
J. Will, S. Eckardt. Optimization of Hydrocarbon Production from Unconventional Shale Reservoirs using Numerical Modelling. Int. J. Petrol. Technol. [Internet]. 2017Jul.25 [cited 2021Sep.25];4(1):14-23. Available from: https://www.avantipublishers.com/jms/index.php/ijpt/article/view/812

Issue

Section

Articles