Phenomenology and Space in Architecture: Experience, Sensation and Meaning
Keywords:Phenomenology, Space, Architecture, Experience, Meaning, Sensation, Environment.
AbstractUntil recently, architecture has been mostly evaluated over its stylistic and visual characteristics. Whereas, the architectural space is primarily vital and therefore, it should not be evaluated independently of its environment and users. Pallasmaa emphasizes on the significance of experience and connection with the environment in architecture. Phenomenology, which aims to create sensory perception, is about creating an abstract experience beyond tangibility. Sensing beyond physical entities in spatial experience deepens meaning. Buildings and cities, essentially provide the necessary view to understand and confront the human existence. It is, therefore, important for architecture to be seen as the subject of phenomenology. This paper explores the relationship between phenomenology and architectural space through experience, sensation, and meaning. It argues that the relationship between human and built environment will be strengthened to the extent that the mentioned features could participate in the space.
Pallasmaa J. The Eyes of the Skin, John Wiley & Sons: UK 2007; pp. 11, 12, 29, 40, 41, 69.
Lefebvre H. The Production of Space (Trans. Nicholson- Smith D.), Blackwell: Oxford 2000.
Harvey D. The Right to the City. New Left Rev 2008; 53: 23-40. https://doi.org/10.1080/17415349.2008.11013714
Smith D. W. Husserl, Routledge: New York 2007; pp. 188.
Spiegelberg H. The Phenomenological Movement: A Historical Introduction, Springer: Berlin 1982; pp. XXVII, 11.
Moran D. Introduction to phenomenology, Routledge: UK 2000; pp. 4.
Holl S. Intertwining, Princeton Architectural Press: New York 1996; pp. 11.
Seamon D. Phenomenology, Place, Environment and Architecture: Literature review, Trans: Sema Serim, TOL Journal of Architecture Culture 2003; 3(39): 36- 53.
Vesely D. “On the Relevance of Phenomenology” In Form; Being; Absence: Architecture and Philosophy, Pratt Journal of Architecture 1988; Vol. 2, Spring, Rizzoli, New York; pp. 59.
Norberg-Schulz C. Architecture: Presence, Language and Place, Akira: Milan 2000; pp. 15.
Merleau-Ponty M. The World of Perception (Trans. Davis O), Routledge: UK 2004.
M. Downs R. & Stea D. Cognitive Maps and Spatial Behaviour: Process and Products. In: The Map Reader: Theories of Mapping Practice and Cartographic Representation, Eds. Dodge, M., Kitchin, R. ve Perkins, C. UK: John Wiley & Sons Ltd. 2011; pp. 312-317. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470979587.ch41
Bachelard G. The Poetics of Reverie: Childhood, Language, and the Cosmos (Trans. Russell D.), Beacon Press: Boston 1971; pp. 6.
Bachelard G. The Poetics of Space (Trans. Jolas M.), Beacon Press: Boston 1994.
Sharr A. Heidegger for Architects, Routledge: New York 2007; pp. 62. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203934197
Dal Co F. Tadao Ando: Complete Works, Phaidon Press: London 1997.
Arch Daily. Church on the Water / Tadao Ando Architect. https://www.archdaily.com/97455/ad-classics-church-on-thewater- tadao-ando. (accessed December, 2018).
Zumthor P. Atmospheres, (Trans. Galbraith I.), Birkhäuser, Publishers for Architecture, Basel/Switzerland, 2006. pp. 6-72.
Armağan CÇ. Through Phenomenological Method and Tectonic Language Design with Material, İstanbul Technical University, Institute of Science, Master Thesis, 2011.
Spier S. Tree Conversation with Peter Zumthor, Place, Autorship and the Concrete, 2001., in Us, 2002
Arkitera. Therme Baths Vals/ Peter Zumthor. http://www.arkitera.com/haber/28805/therme-vals-kaplicalaribir- bencilin-elinde-. (accessed December, 2018).
Us, F. Wright Architecture-Nature Relationship MSU, Institute of Science, Master Thesis,. 2002.
Joedicke J. (1966). A History of Modern Architecture, Frederick A. Praeger: New York 1963.
Cimcoz, N. Frank Lloyd Wright and Typology of House. Ege Architecture ,1998,. (26), 29-31.
Arkitektuel. Fallingwater House, Frank Lloyd Wright. https://www.arkitektuel.com/fallingwater-evi-selale-evi/. (accessed December, 2018).
Kengo Kuma: http://www.mimdap.org/?%20p=6781 (accessed December, 2018).
The Journal of the American Institute of Architects, Kengo Kuma on His Design Approach; [updated 2016 Jan 25; cited 2019 Jan 25
Kengo Kuma https://www.domusweb.it/en/architecture/- 2018/01/04/kengo-kuma-time-flows-and-sodoes% 20architecture.html (accessed December , 2018).
Kuma K. Anti Object (Trans. Watanabe H.), Architectural Association: London 2008; pp. 45.
Archeyes. Great (Bamboo) Wall/ Kengo Kuma. http://archeyes.com/commune-great-bamboo-wall-kengokuma- associates/. (accessed December, 2018).
Kortan E. An Aesthetic View to XXTh Century Architecture: P. 43-44, Yaprak Publishing, Ankara 1986, pp. 43, 44, 52.
Harvey D. The Condition of Postmodernity, Blackwell: Cambridge 1992.
Merleau-Ponty M. Cezanne’s Doubt (From Sense and Non- Sense), Northwestern University Press: Illinois 1964; pp. 19.
Architecture, Design, Theory. The German Pavilion in Barcelona Expo 1929/ Mies Van Der Rohe. https://architecturedesigntheory.wordpress.com/2014/03/09/ mimarlik-ve-fenomenoloji/. (accessed December , 2018).