Identification of Environmental Cues and Decision-Making Strategies of Residential Burglars
Keywords:Residential burglary, target selection, environmental cues, decision-making strategies.
AbstractIn this study, as a preliminary study for a development of a residential burglars' target selection model, previous studies on residential burglars' target selection were reviewed and analyzed in terms of methods and purposes of research, and the implications for future research were suggested by integrating the results of the review. Firstly, it seems that the experimental research method has many advantages for developing the target selection model at the house level compared to using crime data and conducting interviews or questionnaires. Secondly, virtual reality can be used as an effective tool in the experiment, since it allows researchers to construct the experimental environment without any constraint and enables participants to be completely immersed. Thirdly, although researchers in the field of architecture tend to mainly focus on deriving environmental cues that influence the decision of the burglar, decision-making strategies used by burglars when selecting targets should also be identified to develop a comprehensive model of burglars' target selection. Finally, considering the cognitive process of residential burglar, several research questions can be derived (i.e. ‘What environmental cues do burglars consider when evaluating each environmental attribute?’, ‘What decision-making strategy do burglars use to evaluate each environmental attribute?’, and ‘What decision-making strategy do burglars use to make a decision on whether or not to commit burglary?’).
Bullock K, Chowdhury R and Hollings P. Public concerns about organised crime. UK: Home Office 2009.
Lee JL. Burglar Decision Making and Target Selection. Police Journal 2006; 6(2): 154-94.
Bernasco W. Modeling micro-level crime location choice: Application of the discrete choice framework to crime at places. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 2010; 26(1): 113-38. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-009-9086-6
Brantingham PJ and Brantingham PL. Environmental criminology. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage Publications 1981.
Cohen LE and Felson M. Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review 1979; 44(4): 588-608. https://doi.org/10.2307/2094589
Cornish D and Clarke R. Situational prevention, displacement of crime and rational choice theory. In: Heal K, Laycock G, editors. Situational crime prevention: From theory into practice. London: H.M.S.O 1986; 1-16.
Brantingham PL and Brantingham PL. Environment, routine and situation: Toward a pattern theory of crime. Advances in Criminological Theory 1993; 5(2): 259-94.
Snook B, Dhami MK and Kavanagh JM. Simply criminal: Predicting burglars' occupancy decisions with a simple heuristic. Law and Human Behavior 2011; 35(4): 316-26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10979-010-9238-0
Homel R, Macintryre S and Wortley R. How house burglars decide on targets: a computer-based scenario approach. In: Leclerc B, Wortley R, editors. Cognition and Crime: Offender Decision Making and Script Analyses. United Kingdom: Routledge 2013; 26-47.
Pogarsky G, Roche SP and Pickett JT. Heuristics and biases, rational choice, and sanction perceptions. Criminology 2017; 55(1): 85-111. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-9125.12129
Dhami MK and Harries C. Information search in heuristic decision making. Applied Cognitive Psychology 2010; 24(4): 571-86.
Dhami MK and Ayton P. Bailing and jailing the fast and frugal way. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 2001; 14(2): 141-68. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.371
Garcia-Retamero R and Dhami MK. Take-the-best in expertnovice decision strategies for residential burglary. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009; 16(1): 163-9. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.16.1.163
Park AJ and Buckley S. Three-Dimensional Agent-Based Model and Simulation of a Burglar's Target Selection. 2015 European Intelligence and Security Informatics Conference. Manchester, UK. IEEE 2015; 105-12. https://doi.org/10.1109/EISIC.2015.39
Bernasco W and Nieuwbeerta P. How do residential burglars select target areas? A new approach to the analysis of criminal location choice. British Journal of Criminology 2004; 45(3): 296-315. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azh070
Peeters M. Assessing the vulnerability of targets for burglary: creating a multi-level observational instrument. In: Ponsaers P, Crawford A, De MJ, Shapland J, Verhage A, editors. Crime, violence, justice and social order: monitoring contemporary security issues. Belgium: Maklu Publishers 2013; 171-206.
Vandeviver C, Neutens T, Van Daele S, Geurts D and Vander Beken T. A discrete spatial choice model of burglary target selection at the house-level. Applied Geography 2015; 64: 24-34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.08.004
Gu TY, Jang KR, Lee MS and Jung SW. How Visibility Related Physical Elements of Street affects Burglary?-in Low-rise Residential areas. Journal of the architectural institute of Korea planning and design 2016; 32(7): 13-20. https://doi.org/10.5659/JAIK_PD.2016.32.7.13
Montoya L, Junger M and Ongena Y. The relation between residential property and its surroundings and day-and nighttime residential burglary. Environment and Behavior 2014; 48(4): 515-49. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013916514551047
Townsley M, Birks D, Ruiter S, Bernasco W and White G. Target selection models with preference variation between offenders. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 2015; 32(2): 283-304. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-015-9264-7
Hwang Y, Jung S, Lee J and Jeong Y. Predicting residential burglaries based on building elements and offender behavior: Study of a row house area in Seoul, Korea. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 2017; 61: 94-107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2016.09.004
Taylor E. PAUSED for thought? Using verbal protocol analysis to understand the situational and temporal cues in the decision-making of residential burglars. Security Journal 2017: 1-21. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41284-017-0104-3
Lee K and Kim J. Experimental Study on the Environmental Cues Which Affect Target-Searching and Selection Process of Residential Burglars. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea 2000; 16(10): 53-60.
Wright R and Logie RH. How young house burglars choose targets. The Howard Journal of Crime and Justice 1988; 27(2): 92-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2311.1988.tb00608.x
Logie R, Wright R and Decker S. Recognition memory performance and residential burglary. Applied Cognitive Psychology 1992; 6(2): 109-23. https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350060203
Lee K and Kim J. An Experimental Study on the Environmental Cues which affect Target Searching and Selection Process of Residential Burglars. Journal of Architectural Institute of Korea 2000; 16(8): 83-90.
Roth JJ and Trecki VL. Burglary Expertise: Comparing Burglars to Other Offenders. Deviant Behavior 2017; 38(2): 188-207. https://doi.org/10.1080/01639625.2016.1196972
Sanders AN, Kuhns JB and Blevins KR. Exploring and understanding differences between deliberate and impulsive male and female burglars. Crime & Delinquency 2016; 63(12): 1547-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0011128716660519
Nee C, White M, Woolford K, Pascu T, Barker L and Wainwright L. New methods for examining expertise in burglars in natural and simulated environments: preliminary findings. Psychology, Crime & Law 2014; 21(5): 507-13. https://doi.org/10.1080/1068316X.2014.989849
van Gelder JL, Nee C, Otte M, Demetriou A, van Sintemaartensdijk I, et al. Virtual burglary: Exploring the potential of virtual reality to study burglary in action. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 2016; 54(1): 29-62. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427816663997
Malleson N, See L, Evans A and Heppenstall A. Implementing comprehensive offender behaviour in a realistic agent-based model of burglary. Simulation 2010; 88(1): 50-71. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549710384124
Kang S and Lee K. A study on the Assessment Variables and Method for the Crime Risk Assessment-Focused on the burglary composed of invasion and street crime. Journal of Safety and Crisis Management 2010; 6(3): 144-71.
Agarbati G. Burglary risk assessment of buildings: a semiquantitative method. Ancona, Italy: Universita Politecnica delle Marche 2015; 1-195.
Gigerenzer G and Goldstein DG. Reasoning the fast and frugal way: models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review 1996; 103(4): 650-69. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.650
Wright R, Logie RH and Decker SH. Criminal expertise and offender decision making: An experimental study of the target selection process in residential burglary. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 1995; 32(1): 39-53. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022427895032001002