Vitality of The Cities

Authors

  • Sena Işiklar Gazi University Department of Architecture, 06570 Maltepe Ankara / Turkey

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-9821.2017.04.3

Keywords:

Vitality, living cities, liveability, city, user.

Abstract

 The physical formation of city, where all members of society live, is created by non-living and tangible elements such as buildings, roads, public squares, and vegetation. On the other hand, city acquires meaning by the existence of citizens, who reinvigorate it, their behaviours within the city and the interactions between them as well as with the city. The more the citizens are actively present in the streets, the more the city is a vivid and living place. There are many studies on vitality and liveability in urban spaces. In this study, urban vitality is defined according to the information gathered from previous researches. By scrutinizing the definitions of vitality made by Lynch and Jacobs, who are leading figures in the subject of research, social interaction, sense of belongingness, and security, inclusion of different functions, transformability, aesthetics and accessibility were identified as criteria determining the urban vitality. As a result of the study, it is asserted that the cities which bear these qualifications are liveable and vivid places which can maintain their existence.

Author Biography

Sena Işiklar, Gazi University Department of Architecture, 06570 Maltepe Ankara / Turkey

School of Engineering, Faculty of Computing, Engineering and Science

References

Definition of vitality. http://www.dictionary.com/browse/vitality?s=t (accessed November 22, 2017).

Lynch K. Good City Form, 5th ed. MIT: London 1987.

Jacobs J. The Death and Life of Great American Cities (Büyük Amerikan Şehirlerinin Ölümü ve Yaşamı), 2th ed. Metis: İstanbul 2015.

Akgün A. Upon the Relationship Between Social Practice with Segregation Based Spatial Practice (Ayrışma-Ayrıştırma Temelli Mekansal Pratiklerin Toplumsal Pratiklerle İlişkisi Üzerine bir Çalışma). Journal of İdeal Kent 2014; 12: 28-39.

Rapoport A. Human Aspects of Urban Form, 1th ed. Pergamon Press: Oxford 1977.

Dempsey N, Bramley G, Power S and Brown C. The Social Dimension of Sustainable Development: Defining Urban Social Sustainability. Sustainable Development 2011: 19: 289-300. https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.417

Tekeli İ. Thoughts on The Development of an Urban Design Theory (Bir Kentsel Tasarım Kuramının Geliştirilmesi Üzerine Düşünceler). Journal of Ege Mimarlık 1993: 93(1.2): 53-58.

Gehl J. Life Between Buildings. Van Nostrand Reinhold: New York 1987.

Hajmirsadegh RS, Shamsuddin S and Foroughi A. The Impact of Physical Design Factors on The Effective Use of Public Squares. Fundamental Journals 2012; 2(3): 49-56.

Moore GT. Environment-Behavior Studies, Introduction to Architecture. McGraw-Hill: New York 1979; pp. 46-71.

Lang J. Urban Design: A Typology of Procedures and Products. Elsevier: UK 2005.

Gehl J. Public Spaces for a Changing Public Life (cited 2017 June 20): Available from: http://www.webcitation .org/query?url=http%3A%2F%2Fplangate.no%2Fmennesker %2FGehl.pdf

Yıldırım Erniş İI. Effects of physical elements on spatial cognition of floating spaces:Relation with environment and human behaviour (Fiziksel Elemanların Yüzer Yapılarda Mekan Algısına Olan Etkileri: Çevre ve İnsan Davranışı İlişkisi Bağlamında İrdelenmesi). Phd Thesis İzmir: Dokuz Eylül University The Graduate School of Natural And Applied Sciences 2012.

Ersin Pamukçu A. Analysis of sense of belonging and residental satisfaction and immediate environment: Example of Bakirkoy (Konut ve Yakın Çevresinde Memnuniyet ve Aidiyetin İrdelenmesi: Bakırköy örneği). Msc Thesis İstanbul: Bahçeşehir University The Graduate School of Natural And Applied Sciences 2015.

Kahraman DM. Livability and Spatial Quality in terms of Human Needs and Spatial Affordances (İnsan İhtiyaçları ve Mekansal Elverişlilik Kavramları Perspektifinde Yaşanırlılık Olgusu ve Mekansal Kalite). Journal of TMMOB Planning 2014; 24(2): 74-84.

Baker EL. Public Housing Tenant Relocation: Residental Mobility, Satisfaction, and The Development of a Tenants Spatial Decision Support System. Phd Thesis Australia: University of Adelaide 2003.

Montgomery J. Making a City: Urbanity, Vitality and Urban Design. Journal of Urban Design 1998; 3(1): 93-116. https://doi.org/10.1080/13574809808724418

Lynch K. Image of The City (Kent İmgesi). Türkiye İş Bankası: İstanbul 2010.

Holland C, Clark A, Katz J and Peace S. Social Interactions in Urban Public Places. Joseph Rowntree Foundation: US 2007.

Whyte WH. The Social Life of Small Urban Spaces. Edwards Brothers: USA 2004.

https://www.pps.org/reference/8-principles-streets-as-places/ (accessed August 15, 2017).

Timuçin A. Aesthetic (Estetik). Bulut: İstanbul 1998.

Tapan M. Evaluation in Architecture (Mimarlıkta Değerlendirme). İTÜ: İstanbul 2004.

Nasar JL. Urban Design Aesthetics The Evaluative Qualities of Building Exteriors. Environment and Behavior 1994: 377-401. https://doi.org/10.1177/001391659402600305

Downloads

Published

2017-12-14

How to Cite

1.
Sena Işiklar. Vitality of The Cities. Int. J. Archit. Eng. Technol. [Internet]. 2017Dec.14 [cited 2021Sep.25];4(1):18-23. Available from: https://www.avantipublishers.com/jms/index.php/ijaet/article/view/787

Issue

Section

Articles