Spatial Variation of Textural Parameters in a Small River: An Example from Khurar River, Khajuraho, Chhaterpur District, Madhya Pradesh, India
PDF

Keywords

Grain size
Kurtosis
Standard deviation
Sieving
Skewness
Sonic shaker.

How to Cite

1.
S. Kanhaiya, B.P. Singh. Spatial Variation of Textural Parameters in a Small River: An Example from Khurar River, Khajuraho, Chhaterpur District, Madhya Pradesh, India. Glob. J. Earth Sci. Eng. [Internet]. 2014Sep.30 [cited 2022Jan.16];1(1):34-42. Available from: https://www.avantipublishers.com/jms/index.php/gjese/article/view/16

Abstract

Texture (grain size) is one of the many parameters, which is used in determining depositional environments of sediments and sedimentary rocks. In the present investigation, texture was analysed from sixteen stations in the Khurar River, Madhya Pradesh, India. Here, grain size analysis was carried out employing mechanical sieving method using a sonic shaker. Frequency and cumulative frequency curves were prepared from the grain size data on centimetre and arithmetic probability papers, respectively. The phi values were determined and used to calculate the statistical parameters such as mean, standard deviation, skewness and kurtosis. It is found that the mean size value varies from-0.63to 0.80 with a graphic mean distribution ranging from -0.27 to 0.40 ϕ, indicating that the size of the river sand is very coarse to coarse-grained. The standard deviation (sorting) shows a range of 0 .69 to 1.65 ϕ. The skewness values of the sediment samples range from 0.19 to 0.29 ϕ, thus, indicating the presence of fine fraction to near-symmetrical fraction in the population. The kurtosis varies between 1.03 and 1.09 ϕ, indicating that 25% of the samples are leptokurtic, 6.25% are very leptokurtic, 50% are mesokurtic and 12.5% are platykurtic. The platykurtic nature in few cases suggests mixing of sediments from two sources. Bivariate plots prepared combining various textural parameters were used to interpret their behaviour in the river sediments. C-M plot was also prepared to understand the dominant mode of sediments transportation in the Khurar River. In this river, all the sediments are dominantly characterized by the rolling process of transportation. This study reveals that sorting varies from poorly sorted to moderately well sorted in the course of the river may be because of dominance of winnowing and selective sorting in the lower reaches of the river.

https://doi.org/10.15377/2409-5710.2014.01.01.4
PDF

References

Flemming BW. The influence of grain-size analysis methods and sediment mixing on curve shapes and textural parameters: Implications for sediment trend analysis. Sedi Geol 2007; 202: 425-35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2007.03.018

Folk RL, Ward WC. Brazos River bar: a study in the significance of grain size parameters. J Sedi Petrol 1957; 27: 3-26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1306/74D70646-2B21-11D7- 8648000102C1865D

Friedman GM. Differences in size distributions of populations of particles among sands of various origins. Sedimentology 1979; 26: 3-32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1979.tb00336.x

Bui EN, Mazullo J, Wilding LP. Using quartz grain size and shape analysis to distinguish between aeolian and fluvial deposits in the Dallol Bosso of Niger (West Africa). E Sur Proc Lan 1990; 14: 157-66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/esp.3290140206

Zhanqiao W, Zhongyuan C, Maotian L, Jing C, Yiwen Z. Variations in downstream grain-sizes to interpret sediment transport in the middle-lower Yangtze River, China: A prestudy of Three-Gorges Dam. Geomorphology 2009; 113: 217-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.03.009

Sarkar A, Paul DK, Potts PJ. Geochronology and geochemistry of mid-Archaean trondhjemitic gneiss from the Bundelkhand Craton, Central India. Rec Res Geol 1996; 16: 76-92.

Mondal MEA, Goswami JN, Deomurari MP, Sharma KK. Ionmicroprobe 207Pb/206Pb ages zircons from Bundelkhand massif, north India: implications for crustal evolution of the Bundelkhand-Aravalli protocontinent. Pre Res 2002; 117: 85- 100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0301-9268(02)00078-5

Folk RL. Petrology of Sedimentary Rocks. Hemphill Austin, Texas 1980; 159.

Reineck HE and Singh IB. Depositional Sedimentary Environments, 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag-Berlin, Heidelberg, New York 1980; pp. 543. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-81498-3

Pettijohn FJ. Sedimentary Rocks. 3rd ed. CBS Publishers, New Delhi 1984; pp. 628.

Lindholmn RC. A Practical Approach to Sedimentology. George Allen & Unwin Publishers, London 1987; pp. 270.

Sengupta SM. Introduction to Sedimentology. Oxford & IBH Publishers, New Delhi, 1996; pp. 305.

Passega R. Texture as a characteristic of clastic deposition. Am Asso Petro Geol 1957; 41: 1952-84.

Udden JA. Mechanical composition of clastic sediments. Geo Soc of Am Bull 1914; 25: 655-744.

Wentworth CK. Method of computing mechanical composition type sediment. Geo Soc Am Bull 1929; 40: 711- 90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1130/GSAB-40-771

Otto GH. Modified logarithmic for mechanical arithmetic probability graph for interpretation of mechanical analysis of sediment. J Sedi Petrol 1939; 9: 62-76.

Keller WD. Size distribution of sand in some dunes, beaches and sandstones. Am Asso Petro and Geol Bull 1949; 29: 215-21.

Inman DL, Chamberlain TK. Particle- size distribution in near shore sediments, In: Hough Spec Pub 1955; 3: 106-29.

Srivastava AK, Mankar RS. Grain Size Analysis and Depositional Pattern of Upper Gondwana Sediments (Early Cretaceous) of Salbardi Area, Districs Amravati, Maharashtra and Betul, Madhya Pradesh. J Geol Soc India 2008; 73: 393- 406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12594-009-0019-7

Friedman GM. Distinction between dune, beach and river sands from their textural characteristics. J Sedi Petrol 1961; 31(4): 514-29.

Passega R. Texture as a characteristic of clastic deposition. Am Asso Petro Geol 1957; 41: 1952- 84.

Passega RS. Grain size representation by C-M pattern as a geological tool. J Sedi Petrol 1964; 34: 830-47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1306/74D711A4-2B21-11D7- 8648000102C1865D

Friedman GM. On sorting, sorting coefficient and lognormality of the grain size distribution of sandstone. J Geol 1962; 70: 737- 57.

Friedman GM. Dynamic processes and statistical parameters compared for size frequency distribution of beach and river sands. J Sedi Petrol 1967; 37 (2): 327-54.

Sahu BK. Significance of grain size-distribution statistics in interpretation of depositional environment. Pun Uni Res Bull 1964; 15: 213-19.

Moiola RJ, Weiser D. Textural parameters: An evaluation. J Sedi Petrol 1968; 38 (1): 45-53.

Visher GS. Grain size distributions and depositional processes. J Sedi Petrol 1969; 39: 1074-1106.

Kalicki T. Grain size analysis of overbank deposits as carriers of paleogeographical information. Quat In 2000; 72: 107-114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S1040-6182(00)00026-4

Bartholdy J, Christiansen C, Pedersen JBT. Comparing special grain size trends inferred from textural parameters using percentile statistical parameters and those based on log- hyperbolic method. Sedi Geol 2007; 202: 436-52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2007.03.008

Passega R, Byramjee R. Grain size image of clastic deposits. Sedi Geol 1969; 13: 180-90.

Passega R. Significance of C-M diagrams of sediments deposited by suspension. Sedi Geol 1977; 24: 723-33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3091.1977.tb00267.x

Bartholoma A, Flemming BW. Progressive grain-size sorting along an intertidal energy gradient. Sedi Geol 2007; 202: 464-472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sedgeo.2007.03.010

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2014 S. Kanhaiya, B.P. Singh