Study on the Function and Planning of Urban River Ecological Corridor
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15377/2410-3624.2024.11.1Keywords:
Urban river, River restoration, Urban ecosystems, Habitat connectivity, Ecological corridorsAbstract
This study investigates the functions and planning principles of urban river ecological corridors, highlighting their vital role in urban ecosystems. Urban rivers, which include both waterways and riparian zones, provide essential ecosystem services such as habitat provision, temperature regulation, pollutant filtration, and flood mitigation. However, rapid urbanization has led to the degradation of these corridors, resulting in habitat fragmentation, reduced biodiversity, and compromised ecological integrity. The paper reviews global efforts and strategies for urban river restoration, emphasizing the significance of ecological methods and public participation in the planning process. A case study of the Yuhangtang River in Hangzhou, China, exemplifies various restoration approaches, including traditional flood control, ecological restoration, and landscape design, all assessed using a multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) framework. The findings indicate that employing the MCDM tool can facilitate planning that integrates the functions of river ecological corridors. Additionally, plans that achieve a balance of ecological, economic, social, and aesthetic benefits are more likely to gain public acceptance.
References
Grimm NB, Faeth SH, Golubiewski NE, Redman CL, Wu J, Bai X, et al. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science. 2008; 319: 756-60. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150195 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1150195
Tadaki M, Brierley G, Cullum C. River classification: theory, practice, politics. WIREs Water. 2014; 1: 349-67. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1026 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1026
Hua J, Chen WY. Prioritizing urban rivers' ecosystem services: An importance-performance analysis. Cities. 2019; 94: 11-23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.014
Gurnell A, Lee M, Souch C. Urban rivers: hydrology, geomorphology, ecology and opportunities for change. Geogr Comp. 2007; 1: 1118-37. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00058.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-8198.2007.00058.x
Wohl E. Toward Sustainable Rivers and Water Resources. In: Wohl E, Ed. Sustaining river ecosystems and water resources. Cham: Springer; 2018, pp. 105-41. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65124-8_4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-65124-8_4
Fan P, Ouyang Z, Nguyen DD, Nguyen TTH, Park H, Chen J. Urbanization, economic development, environmental and social changes in transitional economies: Vietnam after Doimoi. Landsc Urban Plan. 2019; 187: 145-55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan. 2018.10.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2018.10.014
Shanahan DF, Miller C, Possingham HP, Fuller RA. The influence of patch area and connectivity on avian communities in urban revegetation. Biol Conserv. 2011; 144: 722-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.10.014 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2010.10.014
Lafortezza R, Sanesi G. Nature-based solutions: Settling the issue of sustainable urbanization. Environ Res. 2019; 172: 394-8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.063 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.12.063
McPhearson T, Pickett STA, Grimm NB, Niemelä J, Alberti M, Elmqvist T, et al. Advancing Urban Ecology toward a Science of Cities. BioSci. 2016; 66: 198-212. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biw002
Guerry AD, Smith JR, Lonsdorf E, Daily GC, Wang X, Chun Y, et al. Urban Nature and Biodiversity for Cities Policy Brief. World Bank, Washington, DC, 2021. Available from: http://hdl.handle.net/10986/36325 (Accessed on November 8, 2024) DOI: https://doi.org/10.1596/36325
Wantzen KM, Ballouche A, Longuet I, Bao I, Bocoum H, Cissé L, et al. River Culture: an eco-social approach to mitigate the biological and cultural diversity crisis in riverscapes. Ecohydrol Hydrobiol. 2016; 16: 7-18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2015.12.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecohyd.2015.12.003
Boelens R, Escobar A, Bakker K, Swyngedouw E, Hogenboom B, Huijbens EH, et al. Riverhood: political ecologies of socionature commoning and translocal struggles for water justice. J Peasant Stud. 2023; 50: 1125-56. https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022. 2120810 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03066150.2022.2120810
Murphy BM, Russell KL, Mould S, Vietz G, Nelson PA, et al. Managing urban riverscapes: An assessment framework to integrate social-ecological values and physical processes. J Environ Manag. 2022; 322: 115862. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115862 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.115862
Walsh CJ, Roy AH, Feminella JW, Cottingham PD, Groffman PM, Morgan II RP. The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. J North Am Benthol Soc. 2005; 24: 706-23. https://doi.org/10.1899/04-028.1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1899/04-028.1
Durán Vian F, Pons Izquierdo JJ, Serrano Martínez M. River-city recreational interaction: A classification of urban riverfront parks and walks. Urban For Urban Green. 2021; 59: 127042. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127042 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2021.127042
Aznarez C, Svenning J-C, Taveira G, Baro F, Pascual U. Wildness and habitat quality drive spatial patterns of urban biodiversity. Landsc Urban Plan. 2022; 228: 104570. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104570 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104570
Zhang X, Zhang L, Wang Y, Shao Y, Daniels B, Roß-Nickoll M, et al. Pollinators and urban riparian vegetation: important contributors to urban diversity conservation. Environ Sci Eur. 2022; 34: 78. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-022-00661-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12302-022-00661-9
Zemo MAT, Menbohan SF, Atchrimi BT, Betsi WCN, Nwaha M, Dzavi J, et al. Effect of Anthropogenic Pressure on the Biodiversity of Benthic Macroinvertebrates in Some Urban Rivers (Yaoundé). Water. 2023; 15: 2383. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15132383 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w15132383
Zingraff-Hamed A, Bonnefond M, Bonthoux S, Legay N, Greulich S, Robert A, et al. Human-river encounter sites: Looking for harmony between humans and nature in cities. Sustainability. 2021; 13: 2864. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052864 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052864
Shen J, Wang Y. An improved method for the identification and setting of ecological corridors in urbanized areas. Urban Ecosyst. 2023; 26: 141-60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-022-01298-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-022-01298-5
Forman RTT, Godron M. Landscape ecology. New York, NY: Wiley, 1986.
Han Q, Wang X, Li Y, Zhang Z. River ecological corridor: a conceptual framework and review of the spatial management scope. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022; 19: 7752. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137752 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19137752
Flink CA. The greenway imperative: connecting communities and landscapes for a sustainable future. Gainesville, FL: University of Florida Press; 2020.
Díaz‐Redondo M, Marchamalo M, Morcillo F, King JJ. Naturalising a heavily modified urban river: Initial habitat evolution in the Manzanares River (Madrid, Spain). River Res Apps. 2022; 38: 727-37. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3932 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.3932
Lim M, Xenarios S. Economic assessment of urban space and blue-green infrastructure in Singapore. J Urban Ecol. 2021; 7: juab020. https://doi.org/10.1093/jue/juab020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jue/juab020
Wilby RL. Constructing climate change scenarios of urban heat island intensity and air quality. Environ Plann B. 2008; 35: 902-19. https://doi.org/10.1068/b33066t DOI: https://doi.org/10.1068/b33066t
Hathway EA, Sharples S. The interaction of rivers and urban form in mitigating the Urban Heat Island effect: A UK case study. Build Environ. 2012; 58: 14-22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.06.013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2012.06.013
Sun Q, Wu Z, Tan J. The relationship between land surface temperature and land use/land cover in Guangzhou, China. Environ Earth Sci. 2012; 65: 1687-94. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1145-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-011-1145-2
Völker S, Kistemann T. Developing the urban blue: Comparative health responses to blue and green urban open spaces in Germany. Health Place. 2015; 35: 196-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.10.015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthplace.2014.10.015
Herlihy AT, Kuntz KL, Benkendorf DJ, Holdsworth S. An assessment of the condition of flowing waters in predominantly urban areas of the conterminous U.S. and its relationship to measures of environmental justice. Urban Ecosyst. 2024; 27: 649-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-023-01475-0 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-023-01475-0
Campos CO, Almeida SFP, Serra SRQ, Calapez AR, Silveira P, Feio MJ. The overlooked margins: how cities impact diversity of plants and terrestrial invertebrates along urban streams. Urban Ecosyst. 2024; 27: 1751-66. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-024-01551-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-024-01551-z
China National Environmental Protection Agency. 1990 Report on the Status of the Environment in China. Available from: https://www.mee.gov.cn/hjzl/sthjzk/zghjzkgb/201605/P020160526546767474779.pdf (Accessed 20 October 2024).
General Office of the Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural Development of the People's Republic of China. Notice on Announcement of the Investigation of Black and Odorous Water Bodies in National Cities. Available from: https://www.mee.gov.cn/gkml/hbb/gwy/201611/t20161124_368169.htm (Accessed 20 October 2024).
Wohl E, Lane SN, Wilcox AC. The science and practice of river restoration. Water Resour Res. 2015; 51: 5974-97. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016874 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016874
Cohen-Shacham E, Walters G, Janzen C, Maginnis S. Nature-based solutions to address global societal challenges. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN; 2016. https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2016.13.en DOI: https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2016.13.en
Blau ML, Luz F, Panagopoulos T. Urban river recovery inspired by nature-based solutions and biophilic design in Albufeira, Portugal. Land. 2018; 7: 141. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040141
Yu S, Bao J, Ding W, Chen X, Tang X, Hao J, et al. Investigating the Relationship between Public Satisfaction and Public Environmental Participation during Government Treatment of Urban Malodorous Black River in China. Sustainability. 2021; 13: 3584. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063584 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13063584
Shi S, Kondolf GM, Li D. Urban river transformation and the landscape garden city movement in China. Sustainability. 2018; 10: 4103. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114103 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su10114103
Huang J, Zhang Y, Bing H, Peng J, Dong F, Gao J, et al. Characterizing the river water quality in China: Recent progress and on-going challenges. Water Res. 2021; 201: 117309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117309 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2021.117309
Bonthoux S, Boulay A, Voisin L. City dwellers' experiences and attitudes towards wild places based on an urban river. Urban Ecosys. 2024; 27: 667-79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-023-01485-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11252-023-01485-y
Prominski M. River, space, design: planning strategies, methods and projects for urban rivers. Basel: Birkhäuser, 2012. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783034611732 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783034611732
Cottet M, Morandi B, Piégay H. What are the political, social, and economic issues in river restoration? genealogy and current research issues. In: Morandi B, Cottet M, Piégay H, Eds. River Restoration. Wiley; pp. 1-47. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119410010.ch1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781119410010.ch1
Naiman RJ, Decamps H, Pollock M. The role of riparian corridors in maintaining regional biodiversity. Ecol Appl. 1993; 3: 209-12. https://doi.org/10.2307/1941822 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1941822
Kietzka GJ, Pryke JS, Gaigher R, Samways MJ. Webs of well-designed conservation corridors maintain river ecosystem integrity and biodiversity in plantation mosaics. Biol Conserv. 2021; 254: 108965. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.108965 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2021.108965
Elmqvist T. Urbanization, biodiversity and ecosystem services: challenges and opportunities. New York, NY: Springer; 2013. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7088-1
Apfelbeck B, Snep RPH, Hauck TE, Ferguson J, Holy M, Jacoby C. Designing wildlife-inclusive cities that support human-animal co-existence. Landsc Urban Plan. 2020; 200: 103817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103817 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103817
Peng J, Zhao H, Liu Y. Urban ecological corridors construction: A review. Acta Ecologica Sinica. 2017; 37: 23-30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2016.12.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chnaes.2016.12.002
Pradilla G, Lamberty G, Hamhaber J. Hydromorphological and socio-cultural assessment of urban rivers to promote nature-based solutions in Jarabacoa, Dominican Republic. Ambio. 2021; 50: 1414-30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01565-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13280-021-01565-3
Yan X, Gao X, Jiang Z, Zhang J. Dynamic cluster analysis of urban river ecosystem using water, climate, and economy nexus. Water Supply. 2023; 23: 3476-85. https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2023.192 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/ws.2023.192
Çelikbilek Y, Tüysüz F. An in-depth review of theory of the TOPSIS method: An experimental analysis. JMA. 2020; 7: 281-300. https://doi.org/10.1080/23270012.2020.1748528 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/23270012.2020.1748528
Foroozesh F, Monavari SM, Salmanmahiny A, Rabati M, Rahimi R. Assessment of sustainable urban development based on a hybrid decision-making approach: Group fuzzy BWM, AHP, and TOPSIS-GIS. Sustain Cities Soc. 2022; 76: 103402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2021.103402
Bhole GP. Multi Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) Methods and its applications. IJRASET. 2018; 6: 899-915. https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2018.5145 DOI: https://doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2018.5145
Wątróbski J, Bączkiewicz A, Ziemba E, Sałabun W. Sustainable cities and communities assessment using the DARIA-TOPSIS method. Sustain Cities Soc. 2022; 83: 103926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103926 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2022.103926
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Yan Huang, Dong Wang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
All the published articles are licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (CC BY-NC 4.0) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
